|  Ultimate subwoofer? August 31, 2009 Editor, I happened to be visiting the JL Audio website today and
            read your April
            1, 2008 article on the Gotham. I could not agree more with your review. I first heard
            the Gotham at the 2005 CES and ordered it. After a two-year wait, serial number 20 was
            delivered and it truly is the finest subwoofer. I have owned several subs from other
            companies, which I managed to destroy the drivers in, but not the Gotham. I found a
            setting of 40Hz and using the phase control really helped fine-tune the time-alignment
            aspects with my B&W Nautilus 800s.  Here are some other recordings I found to be very
            impressive on the Gotham: 
              Pete Belasco, Deeper on CD (Compendia Records), title
                track (spectrum analyzer shows signals down to 18Hz)Boston Symphony/Munch, Saint-Saens Symphony No. 3 on CD
                (Living Stereo LSC-2341 Red Seal), pipe organ is wonderfulTransformers movie, the scene with the robot flying
                over the woman in a blue dress (unbelievable low end, the ultimate test for subwoofers) Now that I found you on the internet, Ill have to
            read more of your reviews! Sincerely, Andy RogulichHigh Fidelity Mastering
 Albuquerque, NM
 www.highfidelitymastering.com
 The Gotham is truly an amazing subwoofer. But there is
            another amazing subwoofer now. Ill unveil it as part of my The Great North
            American Loudspeaker Tour. Be sure to start checking the "TWBAS" section of
            this website on Monday. . . . Jeff Fritz 
 The Great North American Loudspeaker Tour August 20, 2009 Editor, I wish to commend you on your adventures on The Great North
            American Loudspeaker Tour. Im sure Im not alone in saying that I wish I
            could come with you! It will be a unique experience and you should gain some singular
            insight into how some of the most coveted loudspeakers in the world sound in some very
            specialized settings. I would have liked to have seen several other speaker types added to
            your list: a large line array like those from Scaena and a full-range electrostat like the
            Sound Lab. I think these would give you a more complete perspective on what people find to
            be the best. But Im nitpicking, and your schedule appears full already. I look
            forward to reading your reports. Sincerely, Frank Dugan 
 ARC CD5 or Reference CD7? August 14, 2009 Editor, Im a reader of Ultra Audio and now I need an
            expert opinion about my decision to upgrade my CD player. Im the owner of an Audio Research CD3 Mk II. Right
            know I have the opportunity to upgrade this CD player to its newer version, the CD5. I
            think I will obtain overall better performance with this new player, but . . . A good
            friend of mine is replacing his Reference CD7 for the newer Reference CD8, and he offered
            me his CD7 (the price he set is a little lower than the new CD5). So now I have a very
            difficult decision: which is better? Ive read a lot of reviews of the CD7 and all of
            them said that this player is very special. The reviews of the CD5 said that this new
            player is an enormous step up from the CD3.  So, a new CD5 or an old Reference CD7?  I know, I know, I need to audition both and decide but what
            do you think about this? If you were in my shoes, what would be your decision? Thank you,Luis Cantu
 If I were not able to listen to the players side by
            side, I think what I would do is ask the folks at Audio Research for their opinions on the
            differences. They are a straightforward group who give frank advice about their products,
            so I would give their opinions some considerable weight in your decision. In fact,
            Ill ask them on your behalf -- because Im curious too -- and will be happy to
            forward their response to you privately by e-mail. Either way I think youll end up
            with a marked improvement in sound quality because, over the years, the ARC components
            that Ive heard have improved with each new generation. I know nothing that would
            make me think otherwise now. . . . Jeff Fritz 
 Paradigm Reference Signature S6 versus S8 August 5, 2009 Editor, I enjoyed your November
            2007 review of the Paradigm Reference Signature S6. I am considering buying a pair. As
            seems to be a recurring theme in audiophile circles, the wife likes the size better than
            the S8. Do you have any update on their performance or possibly a comparison with the S8?
            Looks to me like the drivers are identical -- save the two extra bass drivers in the S8.
            The crossovers are configured a bit different, but I might be able to catch that extra low
            with a Servo sub. I think the wife can buy off on the "necessity" of a sub for
            theater.  Thank you for any input you might have. Jim Ledbetter I think youve got a great handle on the main
            differences and the pros and cons of each model. The only additional comment I could make
            is that the tweeter height is different on each model, and therefore there could be some
            slight high-frequency differences between the two. But the models are far more similar
            than dissimilar.  If it were me, I'd consider pairing a Paradigm
            subwoofer with the S6 and call it a day. That configuration will allow you to run the LFE
            channel of a movie soundtrack into the sub, which is the best equipped to handle super-low
            frequencies at high output levels. In the HT scenario the S6/Servo combo would actually be
            preferable. And keeping the wife happy is a definite plus! . . . Jeff Fritz    |